Skip Navigation Links
Front Page
About GNSExpand About GNS
Business/Industry
CommunitiesExpand Communities
EducationExpand Education
Entertainment
Links Directory
Maritime
Medicine & Science
Opinion/ForumExpand Opinion/Forum
Public Safety
Transportation
Weather


Houston Maritime Museum
Harris County
American Bar Association
News Release
Thursday, August 10, 2017

ABA urges Fifth Circuit to rule rigid bail system
used in Harris County, Texas, unconstitutional

CHICAGO — The American Bar Association filed an amicus brief Wednesday, contending that a bail system in Harris County, Texas, that allows pretrial release only if the defendant pays a secured amount of bail money violates the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses of the 14th Amendment.

The brief is the ABA’s third amicus brief challenging money-bail systems, popular in scores of jurisdictions nationwide, that do not consider a defendant’s ability to pay. It comes a few days before the ABA House of Delegates meets and considers Resolution 112C. The resolution urges governments to adopt pretrial detention policies and procedures that favor release on personal recognizance or unsecured bonds and to permit cash bonds or secured bonds only upon a court finding that such financial conditions will ensure appearance. The House meets near the close of the ABA Annual Meeting that begins Thursday in New York.

The brief, in support of a group of defendants in Harris County, notes that a money-bail system for misdemeanors that does not take into consideration the defendant’s ability to pay is unfair, will hobble the accused person’s ability to muster a defense to the charges and imposes a grave human toll. The case is now before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

“Under our system of justice, the right of any individual to liberty, and to effective defense against criminal charges, should not depend on that person’s ability to pay,” the ABA brief said. As an alternative to the money bail system, the brief cites the ABA’s Criminal Justice Standards as providing “guidance on how jurisdictions can protect the constitutional rights of the accused while advancing their legitimate criminal justice interests.”

In the past 16 months, the ABA filed similar briefs in two other cases. In Rodriguez v. PCC, the ABA challenged use of a probation fee schedule employed by a for-profit company in Rutherford County, Tenn. The second brief was in the 11th Circuit in Maurice Walker v. City of Calhoun, Ga.

The amicus brief in in O’Donnell v. Harris County, Texas is here. 

With more than 400,000 members, the American Bar Association is one of the largest voluntary professional membership organizations in the world. As the national voice of the legal profession, the ABA works to improve the administration of justice, promotes programs that assist lawyers and judges in their work, accredits law schools, provides continuing legal education, and works to build public understanding around the world of the importance of the rule of law. View our privacy statement online. Follow the latest ABA news at www.americanbar.org/news and on Twitter @ABANews.




BayTran
Remembering Jim Guidry Bay Area Houston Economic Partnership


Guidry News Service is headquartered in Midtown Houston.
at 4001 Fannin Street, Suite 4109, Houston, TX. 77004-4077
(409) 763 NEWS(6397)         News@GuidryNews.com
© 1996, Guidry News Service. Duplication of any part of this website in any manner is prohibited.