Skip Navigation Links
Front Page
About GNSExpand About GNS
CommunitiesExpand Communities
EducationExpand Education
Links Directory
Medicine & Science
Opinion/ForumExpand Opinion/Forum
Public Safety

GRCC Bay Area Houston Economic Partnership
Guidry News Forum
The Najvar Law Firm
News Release
Monday, December 18, 2017

Concerned Taxpayer James Noteware Files Election Contest
Challenging Proposition A’s Deceptive Ballot Language

Last Friday, December 15, Houston taxpayer James Noteware filed suit in Harris County District Court challenging the validity of the November election as to Proposition A, because the ballot description of the Proposition was materially misleading to Houston taxpayers.

“Prop A asked Houstonians to shoulder another billion-plus dollars in bond debt, but hid from voters the fact that the Proposition gives the City new taxing authority—outside the limitation on the growth of property tax revenue, which voters added to the Charter in 2004—to pay off this debt,” said Noteware.

The suit seeks to void the election and establish that, if the City wants to hold another election on the measure, it must clearly disclose on the ballot that the Proposition would create a billion-dollar exception to the property tax revenue limitation in the Houston Charter.

This is not the first time the City of Houston’s ballot language has been challenged as misleading to voters. In fact, the Texas Supreme Court held in two different cases in 2015 that Houston’s ballot language, first describing 2010’s “Rain Tax” measure, and then regarding the referendum on the “Equal Rights Ordinance” (ERO), was materially misleading. The ERO referendum election was subsequently held in November 2015, with language corrected as directed by the Supreme Court. The 2010 Rain Tax election has been declared void, with the lower court presently in the process of scheduling a new election.

Noteware is represented by Jerad Najvar, a Houston attorney specializing in election and constitutional law.

“The City Charter has a limitation on the annual growth of property tax revenue. So when voters go to the booth, even if they’re voting on a new bond, they quite reasonably can expect that any additional burden on their pocketbooks will be mitigated by the Charter’s limitation on annual property tax rate increases, unless they are told otherwise,” said Najvar. “But if the vote will create an exception to the property tax cap, as Prop A does, then that is a material fiscal burden on the taxpayers and, just as the Supreme Court said in the Rain Tax case, such fiscal burdens must be disclosed directly on the ballot.”

Noteware and Najvar will be available to answer questions at a press conference as follows:
Monday, December 18 at 2:00 p.m.
City Hall, Main Entrance*
901 Bagby
Houston, TX 77002

*Forecast shows it should be clear by 2 pm. If it is raining, we can move across Bagby St. to beneath the overhang at the City Hall Annex.

The case is Noteware v. Turner, No. 2017-83251. It has been assigned to the 269th District Court; however, the Election Code requires that a special judge from outside Harris, Fort Bend or Montgomery County be assigned to preside in the case.


Jerad Najvar specializes in litigation and appeals in election and constitutional matters, and is founder of Najvar Law Firm, PLLC in Houston. He secured a federal-court judgment in 2014 striking down Houston’s former campaign “blackout period,” which prohibited candidates from fundraising until the last nine months before an election.

Remembering Jim Guidry

Guidry News Service is headquartered in Midtown Houston.
at 4001 Fannin Street, Suite 4109, Houston, TX. 77004-4077
(409) 763 NEWS(6397)
© 1996, Guidry News Service. Duplication of any part of this website in any manner is prohibited.